


Materialists Review Roundup: Celine Song’s Rom-Com Reinvention Sparks Love and Debate
0
0
0

Celine Song’s Materialists, released on June 13, 2025, by A24, has ignited a passionate Materialists Review Roundup, with critics and early audiences buzzing about its blend of romantic comedy charm and piercing social commentary.
Starring Dakota Johnson as a New York City matchmaker caught in a love triangle with Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans, the film has been hailed as both a nostalgic throwback and a subversive take on the rom-com genre.
However, reactions are mixed, with some praising its emotional depth and others critiquing its reliance on familiar tropes. Drawing from verified reviews, social media reactions, and industry insights, this article explores what critics and viewers are saying about Materialists and what it means for Song’s sophomore effort.
What Are Critics Saying About Materialists’ Story and Themes?
Critics have lauded Materialists for its exploration of love, money, and modern dating, often highlighting Celine Song’s ability to elevate rom-com conventions. The BBC describes it as “a piercingly honest exploration of love and money,” sidestepping traditional rom-com fluff for a character-driven narrative akin to Past Lives.
Roger Ebert’s review praises its “soulful romantic dramedy” approach, noting its Jane Austen-inspired question: marry for love or money? Discussing Film calls it “enchanting,” emphasizing Song’s thoughtful pacing and philosophical discussions on marriage as a business venture.
However, not all reviews are glowing. World of Reel argues the film lacks the personal touch of Past Lives, calling it a “self-aware riff” that falls back on clichés like dramatic reveals and neat resolutions, losing emotional footing. This divide suggests Materialists balances charm with formulaic pitfalls, sparking debate about its sincerity.
How Do the Performances Shape the Film’s Reception?
The star-studded cast—Dakota Johnson, Chris Evans, and Pedro Pascal—drives much of the Materialists buzz. Critics widely praise Johnson’s Lucy, with Roger Ebert noting her “aspirational glamour” and effortless charm as a matchmaker.
Evans delivers “vulnerable, career-best work,” per social media reactions, with his melancholic ex-boyfriend John resonating as the film’s emotional core. Pascal’s wealthy suitor Harry is called “charming and nuanced,” though some feel his role leans into predictable tropes.
Zoë Winters, as Lucy’s client Sophie, steals scenes with her raw performance, tying together themes of vulnerability and bravery in love. Social media posts, like @rileyutley’s, highlight the “stunning juxtaposition” between Evans and Pascal, with Johnson leading “flawlessly.” Yet, some Reddit users on r/Fauxmoi critique Johnson’s casting, arguing she plays “the same character” repeatedly, reflecting polarized fan sentiment.
Does Materialists Succeed as a Romantic Comedy?
The film’s rom-com credentials are a focal point of discussion. Social media reactions, such as @TheJosieMarie’s, call Materialists “a breath of fresh air,” gliding with rom-com lightness while tackling modern dating’s “red flags.” @LiamTCrowley dubs it his “favorite film of the year,” praising its simplistic yet resonant execution. The trailer’s throwback voiceover, evoking 1960s trailers, has been celebrated as a nostalgic nod, with ScreenRant noting it clarifies the film’s “thematic essence.”
Conversely, some critics and fans question its rom-com label. GamesRadar argues that calling Materialists an “elevated rom-com” mirrors the problematic “elevated horror” trend, implying rom-coms need to transcend their genre to be taken seriously. Reddit users on r/A24 express mixed feelings, with some disappointed by its “formulaic” marketing, expecting more subversion from Song and A24. This tension underscores Materialists’ attempt to balance genre familiarity with indie polish.
How Does Celine Song’s Direction Influence the Film?
Song’s sophomore effort is frequently compared to Past Lives, with critics noting her signature talky, character-driven style. The BBC praises its “exquisitely made” quality and “glittering dialogue,” likening it to Past Lives’ nuanced storytelling.
Discussing Film highlights Song’s New York City backdrop, contrasting lonely skyscrapers with gestures of longing, showcasing her visual storytelling. Social media, like @EvanRomano’s post, commends her empathy for every character, a trait carried over from her debut.
However, World of Reel critiques Song’s script for turning characters into “mouthpieces” for arguments about love and class, especially in the third act. Some Reddit users echo this, feeling the trailer suggests a “direct-to-Netflix” vibe, questioning A24’s commercial pivot. Song’s ability to subvert expectations—hinted at in Letterboxd reviews calling it a “catfish” that dissects modern dating—remains a divisive strength.
What Role Does the Love Triangle Play in the Narrative?
The love triangle between Lucy, Harry, and John is central to Materialists’ appeal and criticism. ScreenRant’s trailer analysis notes Lucy as the “vertex” of the triangle, her romantic choices impacting her matchmaking career, driving the film’s conflict. Social media reactions, like @ryan_reflects’, praise Song’s “pointed dialogue” and complex characters, subverting rom-com expectations.
The film’s exploration of love versus wealth resonates, with Roger Ebert highlighting its “brutally honest” depiction of 21st-century dating.
Yet, some fans on r/Fauxmoi find the trope tired, predicting a third-act reveal where Pascal’s “perfect” Harry turns villainous, pushing Lucy toward Evans’ “imperfect” John. World of Reel agrees, arguing Lucy’s transformation feels “forced,” leaning on familiar rom-com tricks. This split reflects Materialists’ challenge: delivering a fresh take on a well-worn formula.
How Has the Film Performed Critically and Commercially?
Materialists debuted with a 95% Rotten Tomatoes score, per @C0BRACLAWS, signaling strong critical approval. IndieWire reports a $12 million opening weekend, A24’s third-biggest, suggesting commercial promise against summer blockbusters.
Reviews from outlets like The Wrap and Variety are positive, with grades like B+ and B, though Slant and The New Yorker lean negative, citing schematic storytelling.
Social media reflects audience enthusiasm, with @davemabaldwin calling it “deeply, achingly romantic,” evoking laughter and tears.
However, r/A24 posts express skepticism, with some fans wanting a less “traditional” A24 film, citing the studio’s horror or esoteric reputation. The film’s box office and critical split highlight its broad appeal and indie roots.
Why Is Materialists a Polarizing A24 Release?
Materialists stands out as A24’s attempt to revive the theatrical rom-com, a genre diminished by streaming. Vanyaland notes A24’s boutique strategy, using star power and Song’s prestige to counter Netflix’s rom-com dominance. GamesRadar critiques the “elevated rom-com” framing, arguing it undervalues the genre’s inherent skill.
Social media, like @blewis1103’s post, praises Song’s “marvelous” script and Winters’ standout role, but Reddit users question A24’s commercial pivot, fearing a loss of the studio’s niche edge.
The polarization stems from expectations: fans of Past Lives or A24’s Hereditary seek bold subversion, while rom-com lovers embrace the nostalgic charm. Song’s blend of both—evident in the trailer’s voiceover and the film’s “somber dissection” of dating—creates a unique but divisive experience.
Some Closing Thoughts
The Materialists Review Roundup reveals a film that’s both a crowd-pleasing rom-com and a thoughtful critique of modern love, sparking love from audiences and debate among critics.
Celine Song’s direction, paired with stellar performances from Dakota Johnson, Chris Evans, and Pedro Pascal, crafts a vibrant New York tale that resonates with romantics and skeptics alike.
While some critique its reliance on genre tropes, others celebrate its emotional depth and nostalgic flair. As A24 pushes rom-coms back to theaters, Materialists proves the genre’s enduring power.
Have you seen it? Share your thoughts below!